Stan Consulting · Marketing Atlas · Case Files · Attribution Cluster

Attribution.

Updated May 2026 · Attribution case files · written marketing audit

Case files on numbers that disagreed with each other. Three platforms, four sources of truth, and a CFO asking which one is real.

Marketing Audit bridge

Business implication.

Reference use: Numbers, tracking, or dashboards do not match what the business sees in revenue. The owner may fund the wrong move because the numbers path does not match the money path. Keep this as an authority reference, then use the route table to decide the next check.

Concept signalBusiness problemNext checksNext route
Symptom matchNumbers, tracking, or dashboards do not match what the business sees in revenue.Compare the concept to the visible business symptom before changing the channel, page, or budget.Open the problem
Proof needThe idea needs evidence before it becomes a work order.Review the closest proof file for the same failure pattern.Review proof
Execution laneThe failing layer appears specific enough to scope work.Use the service route only when the constraint is named.See service
Unknown layerThe account, site, offer, tracking, or follow-up path may still be the leak.Get the written marketing audit before another rebuild, retainer, or budget increase.Get marketing audit

Have a case that looks like one of these.

The marketing audit checks the operating account, not the brief. Three hours, written deliverable, the structural decomposition of where the spend actually went.

Conversion Audit All Case Files