Stan Consulting · Marketing Atlas · Case Files · Agency Burn Cluster

Agency Burn.

Updated May 2026 · Agency-burn case files · written marketing audit

Case files on agency engagements that produced numbers the bank disagreed with. Spend that compounded the wrong way and numbers that hid it.

Marketing Audit bridge

Business implication.

Reference use: Agency, vendor, retainer, or outsourced marketing spend is not producing a clear return. The business may renew, fire, or switch vendors before the actual real problem is known. Keep this as an authority reference, then use the route table to decide the next check.

Concept signalBusiness problemNext checksNext route
Symptom matchAgency, vendor, retainer, or outsourced marketing spend is not producing a clear return.Compare the concept to the visible business symptom before changing the channel, page, or budget.Open the problem
Proof needThe idea needs evidence before it becomes a work order.Review the closest proof file for the same failure pattern.Review proof
Execution laneThe failing layer appears specific enough to scope work.Use the service route only when the constraint is named.See service
Unknown layerThe account, site, offer, tracking, or follow-up path may still be the leak.Get the written marketing audit before another rebuild, retainer, or budget increase.Get marketing audit

Have a case that looks like one of these.

The marketing audit checks the operating account, not the brief. Three hours, written deliverable, the structural decomposition of where the spend actually went.

Conversion Audit All Case Files